KHELPATH
I built a sports-pathway demo that checks eligibility before ranking options and shows families which rules apply.
Live demo- Role
- Designer & builder
- Duration
- 2026
- Team
- Independent project
- Status
- Live demo
Before ranking a route, check whether it’s open
If a family is deciding how to help a child pursue a sport, the first useful answer might be an age cutoff, a qualification or a document to find. A ranked list can send someone down a dead end if it ignores those conditions. I designed KhelPath to check them before it ranks a route.
For Build What Moves India, I directed AI coding agents to build a working demo around that model. Its taxonomy covers 201 sports and 608 sports-economy roles, with 18 role journeys.
Show the rule and the way forward
I chose deterministic rules for eligibility. The same inputs produce the same decision and reasons, with no AI model running at recommendation time. Each decision shows the rule date, source and evidence required. A guardian can see what blocked a route and which requirement they would have to meet to pursue it.
I also designed for families who might share a device or have an unreliable connection. The demo includes a low-bandwidth route. Translation coverage is partial, with English used wherever a translation is unavailable.
The public demo uses fictional and sample records. Its scope is to show how pathways and rules could be presented. Practitioners and families still need to validate the rules and the experience before either can support real decisions.
The record
What the evidence says.
- Sports mapped
- 201
- Demo taxonomy
- Sports-economy roles mapped
- 608
- Demo taxonomy
- Role journeys designed
- 18
- Pathway model
- Runtime AI models
- 0
- Deterministic rules
KhelPath / Workflow
How a pathway earns a recommendation
- Start with a pathway
The demo evaluates a prospective next step using its pathway rules and sample records.
- Check hard requirements
Eligibility rules run before ranking. Rule dates, sources and evidence requirements explain the decision.
- Show the next step
Rank eligible steps and show why a blocked step is unavailable.
Worked explanationFollow a blocked pathway
- Input
- A fictional applicant considers a route with an eligibility requirement.
- Decision / rule
- Check the requirement before ranking the route. Show the rule date, source and evidence required.
- Outcome
- If a requirement is unmet, explain the block; ranking considers eligible routes.
Scope of this exampleThis uses no real applicant or eligibility rules. The public demo has fictional records and partial translations.
Working through a similar decision?
Talk to me about your project